Questions for your situation
Is multiplying likelihood by impact sufficient for every risk?
A simple matrix can help prioritise some situations but cannot represent every uncertainty or interaction. Explain the scales, data sources and decision boundaries. Rare severe outcomes or dependent risks may require additional analysis. Select the method for the decision needed, rather than merely for ease of generating a score.
Which department is correct if two teams score the same risk differently?
First check whether the risk definition, time horizon, affected area and scales are the same. Different perspectives may provide useful information. Discuss evidence and assumptions openly and record uncertainty. Training should develop shared, explainable decision criteria rather than force scores to agree.
Can residual risk automatically be lowered after a control is written down?
Evidence is needed that the control is implemented, appropriate and effective. Assess planned controls separately from operating controls. Define ownership, frequency, monitoring and failure conditions. Adding a sentence to a procedure does not demonstrate actual risk reduction; any calculation or score change should rest on supporting evidence.
Can supplier risk be transferred completely through a contract?
A contract can allocate responsibilities without eliminating every delivery, quality or reputational impact. Consider alternative sources, stock, monitoring and incident response. Two suppliers relying on the same lower-tier supplier may not provide real diversification. Training cases should make such common dependencies visible.
Does ISO 31000 training give our company risk management certification?
ISO 31000 is guidance for risk management, not a certifiable management system standard. A training document records attendance or assessment outcomes for a particular course. The maturity of organisational practice needs separate evaluation. Quotations should describe training, consultancy and independent review according to their actual scope.
Is updating the risk register once a year sufficient?
Set review frequency according to the nature of the risk and speed of change. A new product, regulation, incident or supplier may require an interim review. Earlier training knowledge may also need updating for a new role. Choose a programme that includes monitoring and reconsidering decisions, not only creating the first table.